![]() PING fans will note both Anser iron models (20) were also forged but carried geometry and footprint more similar to the i15 cavity-back.īlueprint is a niche product, best suited to accomplished ball-strikers. With that, PING designed its first 100% forged muscle-back iron. To hit the types of shots players like Bubba Watson and Louis Oosthuizen sought, the clubhead had to be smaller and more workable. They didn’t come right out and say that explicitly, it was more along the lines of “Hey, I don’t know exactly what I want the club to be, but here’s what I want it to be able to do.”įor PING the answer (or should I say anser?) was clear. What PING staffers articulated was a desire for something more workable than the iBlade. Those bits of information become the foundation for new product ideas – some of which eventually make it to retail. Major OEMs routinely engage with tour staff to gain feedback and meaningful insights. Historically, G-series irons assumed the role of game-enjoyment clubs with the I-series satisfying the needs of better players looking for more workability at the expense of some forgiveness.īlueprint, which sounds like an internal code name, is in some ways entirely different, yet still, everything we’ve come to expect from a PING iron. “ a bit of an extended R&D experiment,” says Paul Wood, VP of Engineering at PING. ![]() PING’s Blueprint iron, beginning with the name, was always destined to be something of a departure from convention.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |